August 21, 2024
8:29 AM
In the fast-paced and complex world of organizational management, understanding structures and people dynamics is paramount. OrgChart, a trailblazer in organizational structures, provides solutions that cut through this complexity and deliver organizational clarity for HR professionals. Our aim is not just to meet the requirements of today but to empower our clients with the tools they need to design the organizations of tomorrow.
In the words of our CEO, Tom McCarty, “In the grand scheme of organizational development, it’s not just about mapping who reports to whom. It’s about understanding the different dimensions of your organization – from the current state to the dynamic changes and the future possibilities. At OrgChart, we are committed to providing a solution that captures this multi-dimensionality.”
With this in mind, we often work with clients who ask, “How do I chart our matrix organization the right way?” A matrix organization chart offers a distinctive perspective compared to a traditional org chart, providing a concentrated view of the people and functions associated with a particular project or objective. This article will delve into the differences between the two and showcase the power of our unique solution that has profoundly impacted our clients.
Welcome to the OrgChart experience. Let’s explore the journey of creating a matrix organization chart together.
A matrix organization chart clarifies non-linear reporting structures within a company, particularly companies that use cross-functional teams. Matrix org charts visually depict the dual reporting lines employees have.
For example: One employee may report to a functional manager (e.g. the marketing director) and also a project manager. Instead of listing this one employee (and their data) in two places in your org chart, matrix charts enable you to account for more complex reporting lines.
Matrix org charts help everyone understand how expertise flows across departments for successful project completion.
Here is a breakdown to help you better understand common types of matrix organizational structures.
Type of Matrix Org Structure | Authority Characteristics | Benefits | Drawbacks |
Weak Matrix | Functional managers hold the most authority. Project managers have limited-authority. They perform coordination roles and rely on functional managers to get things done. | Functional expertise and tasks are prioritized. Easily translates from a traditional hierarchical structure. | Functional priorities may overshadow project initiatives. Project managers may become frustrated due to lack of control and reliance on functional managers. |
Balanced Matrix | Equal prioritization and power between functional managers and project managers. Employee and team members report equally to both. | Promotes better collaboration. Encourages knowledge sharing across functions and projects. Project managers maintain some control over project goals. | Dual reporting requires strong communication, prioritization, and management skills. Potential for conflicting priorities. Potential for unclear decision-making authority. |
Strong Matrix | Project managers have significant control and authority, allowing them to control key aspects of resources, budget, and team members. | Enables a project-oriented workplace culture with emphasis on goal attainment. Allows for quick decisions and pivots by project managers. | Functional managers may feel disconnected from their teams. Functional expertise may be undervalued and/or underutilized. |
A well-designed matrix organization chart is crucial for fostering clear communication and effective collaboration within a dual reporting structure. But mapping out your org chart can be a challenge!
Here’s a breakdown of the key elements to consider when building your matrix org chart:
Creating a matrix organizational chart can seem daunting, but with OrgChart, the process becomes straightforward and manageable. Here are the steps to help you make your matrix organizational chart with ease:
Before you start, ensure that you have the data you desire to have in your org chart available somewhere. This includes employee names, job titles, managers, and department details. The data should also contain any secondary reporting relationships or project-specific assignments.
Using OrgChart, import your data. Our platform can easily integrate with popular HRIS, simplifying this process. If your core HR system does not allow you to assign an employee to more than one manager, you can upload an Excel file with the necessary information.
Enable Auxiliary Reporting in the Chart Settings: Mapping panel, and then refresh. OrgChart will automatically generate a second employee box for those who report to more than one manager.
You can use the View Manager to format how these boxes look, and make them distinct from other records, if desired.
Once you’ve formatted how you want your chart to look, you can use OrgChart’s filtering and highlighting tools to filter by project or functional area, seeing auxiliary employees appear under both their primary and secondary supervisors. Finally, share the interactive org chart within your organization, or collaborate with key stakeholders to add key data metrics and generate “what-if” scenarios.
Compared to traditional hierarchical structures, a matrix organizational structure offers several advantages. Let’s discuss the key benefits that can be particularly attractive for organizations:
While matrix org chart structures offer plenty of advantages, here are some things HR professionals and leadership will need to keep in mind:
Challenges of Matrix Org Structures | Key Considerations | How to Mitigate |
High Level of Complexity | Managing dual reporting lines and cross-functional teams can be intricate and challenging. Clear communication and well-defined roles are essential to avoid confusion and wasted effort. | Leverage communication tools: Make it easy for employees to communicate with functional management and project management. Invest in team training and onboarding: From the start, help employees develop a clear understanding of their roles within their departments and teams. Develop RACI charts: Clearly define who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for specific project tasks. |
Frequent Role Confusion | With dual reporting lines, employees might experience unclear expectations or conflicting priorities from their functional manager and project manager. | Establish frequent check-ins: Schedule check-ins with functional managers, project managers, and team members to ensure everyone is aligned on roles and responsibilities. Collaborate with functional and project leadership: Take time to clarify and define roles within the department and projects. |
Manager-to-Manager Conflict | Functional managers and project managers may have differing priorities or management styles. This can lead to interpersonal conflict, confuse team members, and hinder project progress. | Follow a clear-cut conflict resolution process: Approach conflict resolution objectively and allow managers to collaborate towards a solution. Ensure executive leadership support: Ahead of a matrix restructuring rollout, get buy-in from executive leadership and stakeholders. |
High Management Overhead | Coordinating and managing multiple teams can add to overall management overhead. | Leverage technology: When appropriate, adopt technologies and automated workflows that can improve communication, streamline steps, and improve efficiency. Comb through the reporting process: Identify areas to streamline, including how to reduce information overload and duplicative reporting. |
Slow Decision-Making Processes | Achieving consensus among multiple players can slow down decision-making within a matrix structure. | Support managers with predefined decision frameworks: From manager empowerment to creating predefined steps and parameters, discover ways to ensure consistency without constant, manual checks and balances from other decision-makers. |
“How can I chart our matrix organization?” is a frequently asked question, but it requires a baseline understanding of this type of organizational structure. Let’s examine how a matrix org chart differs from a traditional org chart before we introduce the how‑tos.
We’ve all seen the basic org chart below. This standard org structure is a formal or payroll hierarchy, providing answers to questions like who reports to whom and some primary data such as name and title. This is a helpful view when you need to know who approves a person’s timesheet or is responsible for an employee review.
Dotted-line org charts, an integral part of matrix organization charts, visually represent secondary or “dotted-line” reporting relationships within an organization. Unlike traditional organizational charts that strictly depict the primary hierarchical structure, a dotted-line org chart introduces an additional layer of complexity by illustrating the functional or project-based relationships. These charts can be handy in organizations where employees report to multiple supervisors, such as in project-based roles or cross-functional teams. A matrix org chart showing dotted-line relationships is also a type of functional org chart.
With OrgChart, you can easily incorporate dotted lines into your charts, clearly depicting these additional relationships and providing a comprehensive view of your organization’s dynamics. Remember, understanding your organization extends beyond knowing who reports to whom in a primary hierarchy; it’s about visualizing the entire operational matrix.
Taking this view further, we can show dotted-line relationships, indicating where employees report to another manager (e.g., a project manager) for a temporary assignment. This view provides both the formal structure of the organization and a perspective on who is working for an auxiliary manager, helping visualize the people involved in a specific project in the context of everyone else in the company.
Creating a matrix organization chart is valuable because it allows a focused view of the people and functions related to a specific project.
OrgChart addresses the challenge of visually representing a matrix organization in sub-charts. By duplicating the box in each sub-chart and including a link to allow users to jump back and forth, it’s possible to see exactly where an employee reporting to two managers sits in both organization groups.
To solidify your understanding of matrix org chart structures, let’s look at a real-world example in the construction industry.
In large construction projects, a matrix structure is commonly used due to the need for specialized expertise across various disciplines. You often need support for laying the foundation, creating the frame, plumbing, wiring, design, and more. And many of these specialties collaborate with one another on a near-constant basis.
Here’s a simplified breakdown of the reporting structure to inform a construction company organizational chart:
As you can see, this creates a dual reporting structure where team members have expertise from their department while also being accountable to the project’s overall goals.
With OrgChart, workforce planning becomes a breeze. It can help you model future organizational changes and understand their impact. Collaborate in real-time with key stakeholders to create actionable future workforce plans and prepare for significant people-related changes or forecast organizational structures post-merger.
OrgChart is the solution for creating visually informative charts at a glance that are easily shareable as an interactive PDF or on the company intranet. This can be automatically generated in minutes and refreshed as the organization evolves and people change.
OrgChart is not just an organizational charting tool; it’s a powerful visualization instrument for HR professionals looking to track key metrics, generate “what-if” scenarios., and trial future organizational states.
Now that you’ve seen the power and possibilities of using OrgChart to create and manage your Matrix Organization Chart, why not take the next step? Unleash the full potential of your org chart with OrgChart. Combine all your people data in one place, visualize the current state, and model your future organization. It’s efficient, effective and provides the insight you need to facilitate workforce planning and realize your organization’s future vision.
Jennifer Taylor is the Director of Client Success with sixteen years of experience in sales and client success. For the past eleven years, Jennifer has been a pivotal part of OrgChart, where she has consistently demonstrated her expertise in building and maintaining strong client relationships.
In her writing, Jennifer leans into her deep understanding of customers and the industry to offer valuable insights to readers.
Tags: